<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should I Sign A Reaffirmation Agreement?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oklahoma-bankruptcy-attorney.com/reaffirmation-agreements/should-i-sign-a-reaffirmation-agreement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oklahoma-bankruptcy-attorney.com/reaffirmation-agreements/should-i-sign-a-reaffirmation-agreement/</link>
	<description>Oklahoma&#039;s trusted source for accurate and reliable information about consumer bankruptcy. Written by Tulsa bankruptcy attorney Dan Nunley who helps Oklahoma consumers and small business owners get relief from serious debt problems through Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 bankruptcy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 11:22:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Callicoat</title>
		<link>http://www.oklahoma-bankruptcy-attorney.com/reaffirmation-agreements/should-i-sign-a-reaffirmation-agreement/comment-page-1/#comment-1262</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Callicoat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 02:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oklahoma-bankruptcy-attorney.com/?p=1216#comment-1262</guid>
		<description>I fight this battle with clients on a daily basis, all day, every day (or so it seems.)

I start by telling them that the courts are increasingly anti-reaffirmation. I continue by telling them that reaffirmations are contrary to the whole purpose of a Ch. 7, which of course is to get a fresh start -- hitting the &quot;reset button&quot; on their financial problems. 

Still yet, people just do not want to give up their car payments ... uh ... I mean, &quot;CARS&quot;. Always the same conversation:

Me: You really should consider giving the car back after bankruptcy, and saving the payments for a $1000 car.

Client (horrified): WHAT? But I need a DEPENDABLE car. 

Me: You can buy a helluva lot of &quot;dependability&quot; for the cost of your monthly car payment.

Client: Are you serious?

And so it goes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fight this battle with clients on a daily basis, all day, every day (or so it seems.)</p>
<p>I start by telling them that the courts are increasingly anti-reaffirmation. I continue by telling them that reaffirmations are contrary to the whole purpose of a Ch. 7, which of course is to get a fresh start &#8212; hitting the &#8220;reset button&#8221; on their financial problems. </p>
<p>Still yet, people just do not want to give up their car payments &#8230; uh &#8230; I mean, &#8220;CARS&#8221;. Always the same conversation:</p>
<p>Me: You really should consider giving the car back after bankruptcy, and saving the payments for a $1000 car.</p>
<p>Client (horrified): WHAT? But I need a DEPENDABLE car. </p>
<p>Me: You can buy a helluva lot of &#8220;dependability&#8221; for the cost of your monthly car payment.</p>
<p>Client: Are you serious?</p>
<p>And so it goes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

